자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell back in '09 Pornhub was operating clean on an identical stack with only a few servers (when you consider the visitors).When you ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who're realistically the one ones needing it, but they noticed an opportunity to scoop up market share in dev in order that they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The only factor bleeding is my eyes once i see something that might be wiped up in a normal PHP/Python/Ruby stack however instead is made with so many dependencies and 3rd get together library that you just wonder if the dude who wrote it actually is aware of programming or if he just glued cool techs collectively because Techcrunch and HackerNews say they're cool.But sure, the smaller gamers are usually using outdated stuff, then once more 99% of the net is. Hence why Wordpress is still a thing.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can assure you that tech peeps undoubtedly are conscious of the bleeding edge of tech, simply that most tend to not purchase the hype.

Inventions that had been ahead of their time can help us to know whether we are truly ready to dwell on the earth we are making. Speculative fiction followers know that you could create an entire world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to explain an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for an entire alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their each element - but hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that symbolize a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the actual world is sort of precisely the same; that’s why invention is a risk. Once we create something new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of support it could have in the world wherein it emerges and the facility it should remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that usually implies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It could possibly be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet laptop, although his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now principally forgotten. In hindsight, it’s straightforward to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological improvement supplied better hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And even though anyone inquisitive about a pill had most likely been ready for one since even earlier than the MessagePad because of the Star Trek universe being stuffed with PADDs, the one thing that basically ready the world for the tablet laptop was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world during which over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to cellular computing is one prepared for a bridge machine between a small mobile display and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, in fact, xnxx isn’t alone. So many merchandise and technologies which can be commonplace at this time made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t truly succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good concepts, but as a result of the world wasn’t fairly prepared and they weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years earlier than Minority Report told us all to count on them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 participant, in fact; that distinction goes to the fully unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the first actually good or actually successful one; the iPod really should get the credit for that. But, it did threat its identity on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was offered to just weren’t ready for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating but fast demise after a well-known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a reality much creepier than any of us want.

But almost a decade later, every major tech firm is both making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which again and again. There are, in fact, many older examples. Much older ones, in actual fact, like the actual first automobile - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the primary gas powered vehicle vehicle introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, but it surely wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it seems that the fundamentals of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The essential concept of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (lengthy earlier than any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video phones would power us right into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many decades). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the first public video call from Washington, D.C.