자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Mindy Seu (b. 1991, California) is a designer and technologist based in New York City. Her expanded follow entails archival projects, techno-critical writing, performative lectures, design commissions, and close collaborations. Her latest writing surveys feminist economies, historical precursors of the metaverse, and the materiality of the internet. Mindy’s ongoing Cyberfeminism Index, which gathers three decades of on-line activism and net art, was commissioned by Rhizome, offered at the new Museum, and awarded the Graham Foundation Grant. She has lectured internationally at cultural institutions (Barbican Centre, New Museum), academic institutions (Columbia University, Central Saint Martins), and mainstream platforms (Pornhub, SSENSE, Google), and been a resident at MacDowell, Sitterwerk Foundation, Pioneer Works, and Internet Archive. Her design commissions and session embrace initiatives for the Serpentine Gallery, Canadian Centre for Architecture, and MIT Media Lab. Her work has been featured in Frieze, Dazed, Gagosian Quarterly, Brooklyn Rail, i-D, and extra. Mindy holds an M.Des. Harvard’s Graduate School of Design and a B.A. Design Media Arts from the University of California, Los Angeles. She is at the moment Assistant Professor at Rutgers Mason Gross School of the Arts and Critic at Yale School of Art.

Now, take a second to look at a number of the demo. I ask you, is that not an impressive thing? Does it not look pretty nice, even by today’s requirements? By all measures, it was a technical marvel and a very good consumer experience. Nevertheless it failed - bitterly. Bell Telephone’s plans for xhamster the PicturePhone were ambitious, if not outright delusional. The cost of a PicturePhone plan was $160/month. Today, flagship cell phones sell at around $a thousand a chunk, but might you think about paying that value each month for service? That’s what $160 would have felt like in 1970. Bell arrange PicturePhone booths in New York, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. 20/minute to make use of them. When was the last time you dropped $150 in a vending machine? That’s the type of expense we’re talking about. As batshit because the economics of the PicturePhone were, Bell’s purpose was to build a $1 Billion company - 100,000 PicturePhones in the primary 5 years; 1,000,000 by 1980; 12,000,000 by 2000. Despite making a fantastic piece of tools and truly dazzling the technorati of the time by making it work properly over old, twisted copper wire, that was never going to occur.

Today, it’s easy to ask why Bell wouldn’t have simply subsidized the product in the early days to construct the market. The answer is regulation. At the time, Bell owned a lot of the infrastructure - the network over which the PicturePhone was transmitting. Taking a loss on the system to lock in prospects would have triggered a massive antitrust case, and well, again then corporations really cared about that kind of thing and so did the government. So, the PicturePhone was compelled to be exorbitantly expensive. Though an economic misfit, the PicturePhone was an excellent machine and an excellent higher catalyst. Researchers at Bell Labs knew that a digital future was at hand, and that new infrastructure could be required to support it. Several years earlier than the PicturePhone was released, Bell produced a film representing their view of the longer term, called Seeing the Digital Future, which anticipated so much of today’s digital and web-driven tradition.

Creating the PicturePhone allowed them to experiment with a few of the interactions they expected would turn out to be commonplace, while also demonstrating the necessity for upgraded infrastructure. That Bell engineers had been capable of ship a device that transmitted stable sound and picture over current telelphone lines was extraordinary. That they have been able to create such a compact, desk-prepared system that was suitable with the telephones already sitting on them was additionally. That the PicturePhone had a camera that used real glass optics and was refocusable and repositionable remotely makes me covet it, even now. Beyond those features, the PicturePhone launched in 1970 anticipated much of today’s web experience. Fluid and frequent digital connections between individuals, completely, but additionally the multimedia nature of how we exchange information at present. Bell added video to what had been a completely auditory connection expertise to this point, however additionally they constructed add-ons to attach PicturePhone to mainframe computers, share slides over the display, and even a mirror module that will allow the unit’s camera to broadcast paperwork you had in your desk.

Undeniably cool, though admittedly area of interest for the time. Bell hoped that gaining a country’s price of subscribers would force a nationwide upgrade in digital infrastructure. As it could end up, even the internet, as we know it today, wouldn’t try this. We would need to distribute credit for making the common American understand the necessity for fiber optic cable amongst a diverse constituency - from Google to Pornhub. Pricing and infrastructure may be blamed for what would turn out to be a $500 million loss for Bell Telephone. Even that number doesn’t actually describe how a lot of a misfire the PicturePhone was compared with the fact that in the primary 6 months, solely 12 prospects subscribed to the service, and by the time it was formally canceled, it had exactly zero of those prospects left. But even in 1970, there have been greater than 12 folks rich sufficient to be early adopters. So why didn’t they?