자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Last week, Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes joined 23 other states in a letter to Pornhub’s parent company with concerns over content material featuring underaged children. As not too long ago reported, an employee for the corporate was captured on video by an undercover journalist discussing Pornhub’s moderation practices, the place he admitted a "loophole." When uploading content to the location, users are required to submit a photo ID but usually are not required to indicate their face within the uploaded materials. The employee admitted there is no such thing as a way to affirm the person uploading the photograph ID is identical particular person within the content. He replied, "Of course," when asked if rapists and human traffickers use this loophole to add content material of their victims to earn money. As you're conscious, varied Federal and state legal guidelines forbid the creation and distribution of CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material.) We're involved that Aylo and its subsidiary Pornhub, and probably other subsidiaries, could also be proliferating the production and dissemination of CSAM by way of the ‘loophole’ recognized by your employee. Please present us with a proof of this ‘loophole;’ whether or not Aylo and its subsidiaries do, actually, permit content material creators and performers to obscure their faces in uploaded content; and, if that's the case, whether or not Aylo is taking measures to alter this policy to make sure that no kids or different victims are being abused for profit on any of its platforms.

Inventions that were forward of their time can help us to grasp whether or not we are truly able to reside on this planet we're making. Speculative fiction followers know which you can create an entire world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to explain a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her each detail - but hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that signify a coherent reality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the heart. Creating objects in the actual world is almost exactly the identical; that’s why invention is a threat. After we create one thing new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the stability of assist it can have on the planet during which it emerges and the power it must remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that usually implies that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It might be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet pc, though his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now mostly forgotten. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological growth offered higher hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And though anybody interested by a tablet had most likely been ready for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being crammed with PADDs, the one thing that really ready the world for the pill pc was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world during which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to mobile computing is one ready for porn a bridge gadget between a small mobile display screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, in fact, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and applied sciences that are commonplace at this time made their debuts in products that didn’t really succeed. Not because they weren’t good concepts, however as a result of the world wasn’t quite ready they usually weren’t highly effective enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls virtually 15 years before Minority Report informed us all to expect them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, of course; that distinction goes to the fully unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the first actually good or actually profitable one; the iPod really ought to get the credit for that. But, it did risk its identity on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to simply weren’t ready for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating but fast dying after a well known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a actuality a lot creepier than any of us need.

But virtually a decade later, each major tech firm is either making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then over and over again. There are, after all, many older examples. Much older ones, in actual fact, like the precise first automobile - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the primary gasoline powered automobile automobile launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, but it wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it turns out that the fundamentals of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The fundamental idea of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (lengthy before any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video phones would drive us into a falseness that anticipated our perfectly curated Zoom backgrounds by many decades). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the first public video name from Washington, D.C.