자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Last week, Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes joined 23 different states in a letter to Pornhub’s dad or mum company with concerns over content that includes underaged children. As lately reported, an employee for the corporate was captured on video by an undercover journalist discussing Pornhub’s moderation practices, where he admitted a "loophole." When uploading content material to the site, porn users are required to submit a photo ID however will not be required to indicate their face within the uploaded materials. The worker admitted there isn't any approach to verify the particular person importing the photo ID is similar individual in the content material. He replied, "Of course," when requested if rapists and human traffickers use this loophole to add content material of their victims to make money. As you're aware, varied Federal and state legal guidelines forbid the creation and distribution of CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material.) We are concerned that Aylo and its subsidiary Pornhub, and probably different subsidiaries, could also be proliferating the manufacturing and dissemination of CSAM through the ‘loophole’ identified by your worker. Please present us with an explanation of this ‘loophole;’ whether Aylo and its subsidiaries do, in fact, permit content material creators and performers to obscure their faces in uploaded content; and, if so, whether or not Aylo is taking measures to vary this policy to ensure that no children or different victims are being abused for profit on any of its platforms.

Inventions that had been forward of their time can assist us to know whether we are truly able to live on the planet we are making. Speculative fiction fans know that you can create an entire world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to explain a complete galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and tablet can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their every detail - but hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that symbolize a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the true world is nearly precisely the same; that’s why invention is a risk. After we create something new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the balance of support it may have on this planet during which it emerges and the power it will have to remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that usually means that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It might be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet computer, even though his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now principally forgotten. In hindsight, it’s straightforward to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological improvement supplied better hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And even though anyone excited by a pill had most likely been prepared for one since even earlier than the MessagePad because of the Star Trek universe being crammed with PADDs, the one factor that really ready the world for the pill pc was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion people used them. A world during which over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to cellular computing is one ready for a bridge device between a small cellular screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, after all, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and applied sciences that are commonplace at present made their debuts in products that didn’t really succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, but as a result of the world wasn’t fairly ready they usually weren’t powerful enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls nearly 15 years before Minority Report told us all to count on them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 participant, after all; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the first actually good or actually successful one; the iPod really should get the credit score for that. But, it did danger its identity on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was offered to just weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating but fast dying after a widely known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a reality a lot creepier than any of us need.

But nearly a decade later, each major tech company is either making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then over and over again. There are, after all, many older examples. Much older ones, the truth is, like the precise first automobile - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the first fuel powered automobile automobile launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, but it surely wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it turns out that the fundamentals of batteries were understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The fundamental idea of transmitting image and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (lengthy earlier than any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video telephones would force us right into a falseness that anticipated our perfectly curated Zoom backgrounds by many a long time). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the primary public video call from Washington, D.C.